🎙️
24

Switched from compressed air to bulb blowers for sensor cleaning after a $600 mistake

Used to blast out mirror boxes with canned air on every CLA. That worked fine until February when a propellant streak landed right on the AF sensor of a Nikon D850 at my shop in Portland. Customer had to send it to Nikon for a $600 recalibration. Now I only use manual bulb blowers for sensor cavities and keep compressed air for body shells only. Anyone else had a propellant disaster or am I the only dummy?
3 comments

Log in to join the discussion

Log In
3 Comments
abbyg60
abbyg6020d ago
@cora863 is right, a rocket blower is just safer and I'll never go back after that mess.
7
the_susan
the_susan1mo ago
Gotta push back on this one a bit. I've been using compressed air on sensors for over a decade and never had a propellant issue with the good brands. You might have gotten a bad can or held it wrong, honestly. When you tilt the can or shake it too much, liquid can come out but that's user error not a product flaw. I still use compressed air on mirror boxes and sensors all the time, just make sure to hold the can upright and do a quick test blast away from the gear first. A bulb blower can work but it doesn't have the same power to really clear out stubborn dust that gets stuck near the sensor.
1
cora863
cora8631mo ago
The whole "user error" argument gets thrown around too much though. Even careful people can get a sputtering can especially if it's cold or almost empty. A rocket blower might not have the same raw power but it also won't ever ruin your gear which makes it the safer bet long term.
4