Okay so I actually READ the footnotes on that 'Plandemic' video versus just watching the clips

The video itself was all scary music and cuts, but the actual source documents in the notes said something totally different, like one was just a patent for a testing method. It completely flipped the argument. Has anyone else dug into the citations on a big conspiracy and found the real story?

3 comments

3 Comments

cameronjenkins12d ago

Totally get this. I fell for a post about some "secret" military tech once. Went and pulled up the actual patent they cited. It was for a basic drone camera mount from like 2005, nothing crazy at all. They just took the title and made up a whole story. Now I check sources on everything. It's crazy how often the real document says the opposite of what the video claims.

rosebarnes12d ago

My buddy got obsessed with a video about this "revolutionary" water filter that could turn pond scum into drinking water. He was ready to buy stock in the company. The video kept pointing to this FDA report as proof. He dug it up, and the report was actually a rejection letter telling the company to stop making false claims. The whole thing was a total scam built on one piece of paper saying the exact opposite. He felt pretty silly after that.

the_mila5d ago

Oh man, that part about the report being a rejection letter is just perfect. It's like they're betting you won't actually click the link. I saw a video once that kept shouting about a "government study" proving something wild. The study was just a two-page PDF asking for more public feedback on park benches. They'll really just point to any official looking document and hope you're too lazy to read past the first page.