Straight up, the moon landing denial crew have way weaker evidence than the flat earthers somehow

I spent 3 hours last night cross-referencing both sides and flat earthers at least use broken physics arguments that sound smart, while moon landing truthers just blurry photo lines and call it a day. Has anyone else deep dived both and noticed one camp is just less convincing?

2 comments

2 Comments

the_emery1mo ago

Yeah, the 'blurry photo lines' thing is honestly just sad.

james_campbell1226d ago

Oh man, I've been there. Yeah, flat earthers at least try to use some math and physics, even if it's all wrong. Moon landing truthers just point at shadows and go "see? fake!" without actually checking anything. My advice is to focus on the specific claims each camp makes. Pull up NASA's own documents for the Apollo missions, they have tons of high-res scans of the original film. Flat earthers will reeeeally trip you up with their globe math if you don't know how to debunk it step by step. Best thing to do is go straight to the original sources instead of getting lost in YouTube comments. It saves a ton of headache lol.