10
Warning: I argued for years that the moon landing was fake, but a single trip changed my mind
Honestly, I was deep into the whole 'studio set' theory, even bought a $25 book about it last year. Then my brother dragged me to the Kennedy Space Center in Florida and I saw the actual Saturn V rocket up close. The sheer size of that thing, the engineering details they had on display, it just hit me that faking that in 1969 would have been way harder than actually doing it. Has anyone else had a moment where seeing the physical evidence just shut down a long-held conspiracy belief for them?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
johnson.faith12h ago
The live broadcast tech actually existed, they just used a special slow scan TV system.
1
jessica_robinson238h ago
That slow scan TV system johnson.faith mentioned is key. They didn't need normal broadcast tech, it was a special signal sent to big dishes here on Earth. I saw one of those dishes, the Goldstone antenna in California, and the scale is insane. @ivan_mason, the idea they faked a live signal that multiple countries tracked from the moon is way wilder than the real mission. You can't fake physics that dozens of independent scientists checked in real time. The rocket got them there, and the tech, while old, was built for that one job.
0
ivan_mason17h ago
Look at the size of the rocket all you want, that doesn't prove where it went. I mean, building a big rocket is one thing, but the tech to broadcast that live from the moon just didn't exist back then. Seeing a museum piece is just seeing what they want you to see, it's not real proof. Maybe they built the rocket but the mission still failed, so they had to fake the rest. Idk, it feels like you got swayed by a tourist trap.
-1